Social Ecological Model: Workplace Violence, Youth Violence and Community Violence

Introduction

Workplace violence (WPV) can seriously harm the socioemotional growth of adolescent workers, and this poses a significant public health concern. Adolescents are fundamentally disadvantaged in the job due to their stage of development, lack of general life experiences. Moreover they might have insufficient skill development. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) highlights the interplay among its four layers. Hence demonstrating their collective influence of individual, interpersonal, community, and societal layers on on WPV.

To address the issue of WPV among adolescent workers, here we evaluate prevention techniques and activities that have been used (or are being used). We will use the Social Ecological Model as a framework to locate a crucial point of entry for preventative efforts. Moreover we will strengthen our advice by considering cross-cutting themes and specific theoretical ideas. By doing this, we hope to offer suggestions that can be put into practice to successfully address the issue of WPV among adolescent workers and advance their general welfare.

Social Ecological Model: Critique of past and current strategies

To advance safety and well-being, implementing interventions to stop and treat violence at all levels of the Social Ecological Model becomes essential. This analysis explores three interventions: the Workplace Violence Prevention Program, School-Based Youth Violence Prevention Programs, and Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programs for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence. Each intervention addresses various Social Ecological Model levels and risk factors. This analysis will assess the strengths and weaknesses of each intervention and offer suggestions for workable solutions to address their shortcomings.

Social Ecological Model Intervention 1: Workplace Violence Prevention Program

Determinant of risk and Social Ecological Model level: The Workplace Violence Prevention Program addresses factors influencing the Social Ecological Model at the individual, interpersonal, and communal levels. This program aims to reduce the risk of workplace violence while promoting the security and well-being of employees.

Description of the program: The Workplace Violence Prevention Program is a comprehensive strategy for preventing and addressing workplace violence. It involves training, education, policy formulation, and risk assessment. The program’s primary objectives include establishing a safe and secure work environment, identifying risk factors, potentially violent behavior, and encouraging early intervention and assistance for staff members who have been victims of workplace violence.

Strengths and limitations: Companies that implemented comprehensive programs to prevent workplace violence experienced a significant decrease in workplace violence incidents. This suggests the potential effectiveness of these initiatives in reducing the likelihood of workplace violence. However, the program’s effectiveness may depend on the organization’s commitment and available resources for program development and maintenance. Additionally, the Workplace Violence Prevention Program may not address issues like organizational culture, power disparities, and socioeconomic circumstances, which are primary contributors to workplace violence.

Social Ecological Model Intervention 2: School-Based Youth Violence Prevention Programs

Determinant of risk and Social Ecological Model level: Programs for preventing juvenile violence in schools aim to address factors influencing individuals and interpersonal relationships within the Social Ecological Model. These initiatives support healthy connections among young people, reduce violent risk factors, and encourage positive social and emotional development.

Description of the program: School-Based Youth Violence Prevention Programs encompass various initiatives, including programs for social and emotional development, mediation, conflict resolution, and mentorship. These programs aim to foster healthy social and emotional development, provide problem-solving techniques, and enhance resilience. They also address risk factors for violence, such as trauma, drug misuse, and exposure to interpersonal violence. Mentorship programs provide young people with supportive interactions and positive role models to aid in their healthy growth.

Strengths and limitations: Research suggests that school-based juvenile violence prevention programs can effectively reduce aggressive behavior among children. These initiatives may help lower risk factors like violence exposure and substance misuse while strengthening protective factors like relationships and social support. The program’s quality, adherence to the model, and characteristics of the target audience can affect its effectiveness. However, school-based programs may not address broader community-level issues, such as poverty and social inequality, which can fuel violence and limit the effectiveness of these initiatives.

Social Ecological Model Intervention 3: Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programs for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence

Determinant of risk and Social Ecological Model level: Psychological intervention and prevention programs for children and adolescents exposed to community violence target determinants at the individual and interpersonal levels of the Social Ecological Model. These initiatives seek to enhance adaptability and mitigate the adverse effects of violence exposure on mental health and general well-being.

Description of the program: These programs encompass individual and group counseling, trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy, and community-based initiatives. They aim to increase adaptability and mitigate the detrimental effects of violence exposure on mental health and well-being. Additionally, they may incorporate parent education and support to help parents and caregivers create a secure and nurturing environment for their children.

Strengths and limitations: According to a comprehensive review by Ali-Saleh Darawshy et al. (2020), psychological interventions and prevention programs for young people exposed to community violence can effectively minimize the negative effects of such exposure on mental health and general well-being. These programs can help children and adolescents learn coping mechanisms, gain a greater sense of security and control, and develop healthier interpersonal relationships. They can also strengthen social support networks and improve overall performance. However, not all programs may be equally effective, and there may be variations in their implementation. Some children and teenagers may be hesitant to seek treatment due to the stigma associated with mental health. Lastly, these initiatives may not address the root causes of community violence, such as poverty, prejudice, and institutionalized oppression.

Recommendation

We recommend introducing the Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programmes for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence. This intervention is based on two theories: cognitive-behavioral theory, which emphasizes the influence of thoughts and beliefs in determining behavior, and social learning theory, which emphasizes the importance of observation and modeling in the acquisition of behavior.

Social Ecological Model: Intervention

The psychological intervention and prevention programs for children and adolescents exposed to community violence include individual and group counseling, trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy, and community-based initiatives. These initiatives aim to foster resilience and reduce the detrimental effects of exposure to violence on mental health and general well-being. These programs also involve parent education and support to help parents and carers create a secure and nurturing environment for their children.

Social Ecological Model: Strength

The psychological intervention and prevention program for child and adolescent exposure to community violence reduce the detrimental effects of exposure to violence on mental health and well-being. This strength-based approach emphasizes resilience, which is crucial for mitigating the impacts of trauma.

Social Ecological Model: Innovation

Enhancing this intervention involves incorporating a strengths-based strategy that emphasizes leveraging the positive qualities and assets of the people and communities affected by violence. In this strategy, we identify and strengthen protective factors so that people and communities can better withstand and overcome hardship. For instance, we can develop community-based initiatives to foster ties among neighbors and the formation of social support networks. This can be achieved by participating in community service projects, youth leadership initiatives, and events that bring the community together.

Social Ecological Model: Theory

One social theory that could help enhance the benefits of this intervention is the Social Identity Theory. According to this theory, group affiliations can influence attitudes and behavior and provide people with a sense of self and identity. Thus, community-based programs can help people feel a sense of connection and belonging by leveraging group memberships and fostering positive social identities, which, in turn, promote resilience and well-being.

Social Ecological Model: Relevance

This recommendation is relevant to the vulnerable group because it addresses the factors that determine risk and Social Ecological Model level. By promoting resilience and strengthening protective characteristics, the Psychological Intervention and Prevention Program for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence aims to reduce the detrimental effects of exposure to violence on mental health and well-being. Risk factors, such as exposure to violence leading to trauma and mental health issues, can be addressed by this intervention. Additionally, it can enhance protective factors like social support, which can mitigate the impacts of trauma and aid in the healing process. This intervention empowers people and communities to thrive in the face of adversity through the use of a strengths-based approach and the cultivation of positive social identities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, after analyzing various intervention strategies for addressing the problem of child and adolescent exposure to community violence, we recommend Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programmes for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence as the most promising approach. To improve this strategy, we have proposed incorporating mindfulness-based interventions, which have shown promise in reducing the negative impact of exposure to violence on mental health and well-being. This innovation builds on the strengths of the existing strategy and addresses its limitations by enhancing the coping skills and emotional regulation of children and adolescents. The recommended strategy is relevant to our vulnerable population by addressing determinants of risk and promoting protective factors such as resilience and emotional well-being.

References

Abeyta, S., & Welsh, B. C. (2022). Effects of prevention interventions on violence in the workplace: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 64, 101747.

Ali-Saleh Darawshy, N., Gewirtz, A., & Marsalis, S. (2020). Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programs for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence: A Systematic Review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(3), 365–378.

Bentley, T. A., Catley, B., Forsyth, D., & Tappin, D. (2014). Understanding workplace violence: The value of a systems perspective. Applied ergonomics, 45(4), 839-848.

Fagan, A. A., & Catalano, R. F. (2013). What Works in Youth Violence Prevention: A Review of the Literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 23(2), 141–156.

Foster, C. E., Horwitz, A., Thomas, A., Opperman, K., Gipson, P., Burnside, A., Stone, D. M., & King, C. A. (2017). Connectedness to Family, School, Peers, and Community in Socially Vulnerable Adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 321–331.

Gadegaard, C. A., Andersen, L. P., & Hogh, A. (2018). Effects of Violence Prevention Behavior on Exposure to Workplace Violence and Threats: A Follow-Up Study. Journal of interpersonal violence, 33(7), 1096–1117.

Henderson, S. N., & Van Hasselt, V. B. (2017). Workplace Violence. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. L. Bourke (Eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Criminology (pp. 537–554). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Piquero, N. L., Piquero, A. R., Craig, J. M., & Clipper, S. J. (2013). Assessing research on workplace violence, 2000–2012. Aggression and violent behavior, 18(3), 383-394.