Gene Editing Revolution: CRISPR and the Future of GMOs

Introduction

CRISPR gene editing and GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) have revolutionized the field of agriculture, offering promising solutions to some of our most pressing global challenges. Some of the most divisive opinions in modern culture concentrate on genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Many people think that GMOs are the long-needed answer to some of the major issues facing the planet, such as feeding the world’s expanding population and recycling materials. Some parties consider GMOs a risk to the environment, on the other hand. Thanks to developments made by transgenic plants, recombinant microorganisms, as well as Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR), the science underlying GMOs has advanced at a dizzying pace.

What does CRISPR gene editing do?

CRISPR (‘Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats’) exists to redefine GMOs. It is arguably the biggest scientific advance of our generation. CRISPR gene editing and GMOs represent two powerful tools in modern biotechnology. Scientists have hailed CRISPR as one of the most important scientific breakthroughs of the 20th century, as it is a cutting-edge gene editing technique. The CRISPR-Cas9 system also called the CRISPR system, is a quick and low-cost way to locate an ‘unhealthy’ genetic structure in an organism, delete it, and then replace it with a ‘healthy’ version. This extraordinary process results in an organism with a repaired genetic sequence that fully composes of its native genes. In other words, even while CRISPR performs genetic editing on an organism, the resulting CRISPR-modified creature is identical to a naturally occurring organism that is free from the disease.

There is an urgent need for extensive research into how this technology might replace GMOs, thanks to these advantages. The agriculture industry is having difficulty comprehending how well the CRISPR system would impact current practices, processes, and goods. This study aims to investigate various ways to use CRISPR-Cas9 to produce better crop types. Furthermore, the current research will concentrate on steps toward genuinely being able to alter chromosomes in a guided manner and presenting new opportunities (for example, by forming or destroying genetic links in crop plants).

What are some issues related to GMOs?

For many years, agricultural researchers have used biotechnology to enhance plants by transfer of genetic material from one plant (or microbial) species into another. These GMOs have given farmers the ability to cultivate plants that are resistant to disease or to spray more pesticides without harming their crops. Many people think that that consuming GMOs has adverse effects on human health, hence, they have been the subject of customer boycotts and strict government regulations in Europe as well as some U.S. states due to mistrust of the large corporations that produce GMOs and concerns about the effects of combining genes from different species. However, more recent gene-editing techniques, like CRISPR, produce the same results without introducing new genes into the target organism. Gene editing is additionally easier, less expensive, and quicker than GMO development.

CRISPR gene editing and GMOs have sparked several contentious issues in the realm of agriculture and biotechnology. The potential for adverse consequences on the body system posed by GM crops and foods is the biggest danger. Researchers think that eating these genetically modified crops can cause illnesses to become resistant to antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, because these foods are relatively recent innovations, we know less about their long-term impacts on people. Many people choose to avoid these items since it is unknown how they may affect their health. Because they believe it would negatively affect their business, manufacturers do not disclose in the labeling that foods are GMO, which is a bad practice.

Controversies Surrounding CRISPR in Agriculture

Many cultural and religious societies oppose such foods because they consider it an artificial method of food production. A lot of individuals also don’t like the concept of introducing animal DNA into plants or vice versa. Additionally, this cross-pollination technique may also harm other creatures that live and prosper in the environment.

In addition to these issues, population increase and climate variability will bring about new difficulties in the ensuing decades. Increasing agricultural output while also reducing environmental damage are two of these problems. Therefore, to meet the world’s food demand while reducing resource consumption and avoiding unfavorable environmental effects, scientists must address these issues. Concerning decreasing biotic and abiotic stressors and boosting yield potential, CRISPR offers substantial chances to enhance agricultural productivity. And with minimal to no consequent environmental pressure, these advancements might be made.

How does gene editing relate to GMOs?

Experts believe that as demand for these foods rises, developing nations will begin to rely more on industrialized nations because it is possible that in the future, these nations will be in charge of regulating food production. The potential of CRISPR gene editing methodology has been highly publicized by scientists. Because it can precisely insert and change DNA with specific specificity and relatively simple implementation, CRISPR is being hailed as a promising technology. Therefore, it can be a key breakthrough in the effort to feed the present and future populations of the globe. We have numerous difficulties in feeding the world’s seven billion people, including yield reduction, post-harvest wastage, access to markets, and nutritional diversity.

Many consumers, especially in the European Union, have had negative reactions to earlier agricultural applications generated from biotechnology, namely GMOs. However, CRISPR gene editing can be very different from the genetic alteration techniques that were first developed in the 1980s and 1990s. Instead of introducing foreign DNA from a distinct species (i.e., recombinant) or a separate variety of the same species, as is the case with classical genetic modification, CRISPR could be employed to introduce modifications to DNA inherent to the target organisms or cultivar.

CRISPR gene editing and GMOs: Understanding the Distinctions and Potential Benefits

The majority of GMOs used for commercial purposes worldwide are the result of transgenic alteration. Consumers may not be able to tell the difference between CRISPR and commonly known GMOs when buying or ingesting food, even though CRISPR can introduce changes to plants and crops that are different from those that can be imposed by GMOs. Some experts claim that because genetic manipulation is relatively simple for those with the right training as well as basic lab establishments and is not tightly regulated by a small number of companies, it might enable developing countries to grow drought-resistant crops or nutrient-fortified fruits and veggies without having to purchase expensive seeds from major multinational corporations. Additionally, CRISPR speeds up the process compared to farmers carefully crossing thousands of species of plants to eventually obtain the desired feature.

Inducing Chromosomal Rearrangements with CRISPR

CRISPR technology can be employed to deliberately induce specific chromosomal rearrangements in several ways:

1. Inversions:

CRISPR can be used to target and cut two distinct locations on a chromosome. When the cell attempts to repair these cuts, it may inadvertently reconnect the chromosome in reverse order, resulting in an inversion.

2. Crossovers:

By introducing double-strand breaks at specific sites on two homologous chromosomes, CRISPR can stimulate a genetic crossover during the repair process. This can be valuable for creating genetic diversity or studying the effects of recombination.

3. Translocations:

Translocations can be induced by simultaneously cutting two non-homologous chromosomes and promoting their fusion. This technique has applications in cancer research and the study of genetic diseases caused by translocations.

Implications and Applications

The ability to induce specific chromosomal rearrangements with CRISPR has far-reaching implications across various fields:

1. Disease Modeling:

Researchers can use CRISPR to recreate specific chromosomal rearrangements associated with genetic diseases. This allows for the development of more accurate disease models and the study of potential treatments.

2. Evolutionary Biology:

CRISPR-induced chromosomal rearrangements can be employed to investigate the role of genetic diversity in evolution and adaptation.

3. Cancer Research:

Understanding the genetic underpinnings of cancer often involves studying chromosomal translocations. CRISPR enables scientists to create cellular models with specific translocations for research purposes.

4. Therapeutic Potential:

While in its early stages, CRISPR-based therapies may one day correct disease-causing chromosomal rearrangements at the genetic level.

Ethical Considerations

As with any powerful technology, the induction of chromosomal rearrangements using CRISPR raises ethical and regulatory concerns. Researchers must ensure responsible and transparent use of this technology, particularly in the context of human genome editing.

In conclusion, CRISPR technology’s precision and versatility have paved the way for the controlled induction of specific chromosomal rearrangements, offering exciting opportunities for scientific discovery and potential therapeutic interventions. While challenges and ethical considerations remain, the ability to engineer chromosomal rearrangements has the potential to reshape our understanding of genetics and revolutionize various fields, from medicine to evolutionary biology.

Regulatory Challenges and Future Prospects

While the potential benefits of CRISPR gene editing in GMOs are substantial, there are regulatory challenges that need to be addressed. Many countries have strict regulations governing GMOs, and the classification of CRISPR-edited organisms varies. Some argue that CRISPR-edited organisms should not be subject to the same regulations as traditional GMOs because of the precision of the technology.

The future of CRISPR gene editing and GMOs will depend on how regulatory bodies and society at large address these challenges. However, it’s clear that CRISPR technology has the potential to reshape agriculture and food production in a way that is more sustainable, efficient, and beneficial to both consumers and the environment.

In conclusion, CRISPR gene editing represents a significant advancement in the development of GMOs. Its precision, speed, and potential to address ethical concerns make it a powerful tool for creating genetically modified organisms that can help address food security, reduce environmental impact, and improve agricultural practices. As we navigate the evolving landscape of genetic engineering, CRISPR gene editing stands at the forefront of the GMO revolution, promising a brighter and more sustainable future for agriculture and beyond.

Conclusion

CRISPR has become a crucial gene-editing technique during the last few years because of its dependability, effectiveness, and variety of uses. By making it simpler to quickly and effectively alter a single gene or even a single nucleotide, CRISPR technology is laying the foundation for more accurate cellular investigations. A growing amount of research is made possible by the availability of CRISPR technology. The abundance of data and resources that have appeared although CRISPR was only discovered a few years ago is evidence of this. It is simple to imagine that numerous new developments and apps will be created in the foreseeable future.

References

Bartkowski, Bartosz, et al. “Snipping around for food: Economic, ethical and policy implications of CRISPR/Cas genome editing.” Geoforum 96 (2018): 172-180.
Benevenuto, Rafael Fonseca, et al. “Alterations in genetically modified crops assessed by omics studies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.” Trends in Food Science & Technology (2022).
Montenegro de Wit, Maywa. “Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, practices, and politics of science and governance on the agricultural gene editing frontier.” Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8 (2020).
Tricco, Andrea C., et al. “PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.” Annals of internal medicine 169.7 (2018): 467-473.
Zimny, Tomasz, et al. “Certain new plant breeding techniques and their marketability in the context of EU GMO legislation–recent developments.” New Biotechnology 51 (2019): 49-56.

.